↓ Skip to main content

Essential Articles on Collaborative Care Models for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Medical Settings: A Publication by the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine Research and Evidence-Based…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Essential Articles on Collaborative Care Models for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Medical Settings: A Publication by the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine Research and Evidence-Based Practice Committee
Published in
Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, December 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.psym.2013.09.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeff C. Huffman, Shehzad K. Niazi, James R. Rundell, Michael Sharpe, Wayne J. Katon

Abstract

Collaborative care interventions for psychiatric disorders combine several components integrated into the medical setting: (1) systematic psychiatric assessment, (2) use of a nonphysician care manager to perform longitudinal symptom monitoring, treatment interventions, and care coordination, and (3) specialist-provided stepped-care recommendations. Collaborative care interventions have now been evaluated in a wide spectrum of care settings and offer great promise as a way of increasing quality of patient care, improving health of populations, and reducing health care costs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 18 15%
Other 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 26%
Psychology 29 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 26 21%