↓ Skip to main content

Subacromial impingement syndrome and pain: protocol for a randomised controlled trial of exercise and corticosteroid injection (the SUPPORT trial)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
324 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subacromial impingement syndrome and pain: protocol for a randomised controlled trial of exercise and corticosteroid injection (the SUPPORT trial)
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-81
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward Roddy, Irena Zwierska, Elaine M Hay, Sue Jowett, Martyn Lewis, Kay Stevenson, Danielle van der Windt, Nadine E Foster, the SUPPORT trial team

Abstract

Subacromial impingement syndrome is the most frequent cause of shoulder problems which themselves affect 1 in 3 adults. Management commonly includes exercise and corticosteroid injection. However, the few existing trials of exercise or corticosteroid injection for subacromial impingement syndrome are mostly small, of poor quality, and focus only on short-term results. Exercise packages tend to be standardised rather than individualised and progressed. There has been much recent interest in improving outcome from corticosteroid injections by using musculoskeletal ultrasound to guide injections. However, there are no high-quality trials comparing ultrasound-guided and blind corticosteroid injection in subacromial impingement syndrome. This trial will investigate how to optimise the outcome of subacromial impingement syndrome from exercise (standardised advice and information leaflet versus physiotherapist-led exercise) and from subacromial corticosteroid injection (blind versus ultrasound-guided), and provide long-term follow-up data on clinical and cost-effectiveness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 321 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 19%
Student > Bachelor 46 14%
Researcher 23 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 98 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 19%
Sports and Recreations 14 4%
Psychology 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 108 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,606,944
of 24,836,260 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#879
of 4,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,346
of 226,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#17
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,836,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.