The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Importance of fish aggregating devices (FADs) as substrates for food organisms of fish
|
---|---|
Published in |
Fisheries Research, July 1996
|
DOI | 10.1016/0165-7836(96)00473-0 |
Authors |
Sakri Ibrahim, Mohd Azmi Ambak, Lokman Shamsudin, Mohd Zaini Samsudin |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 34% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 17% |
Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 53% |
Environmental Science | 10 | 14% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,758,839
of 26,485,222 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Research
#537
of 3,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,760
of 28,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,485,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them