You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Selection of complementary foods based on optimal nutritional values
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-017-05650-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Partho Sen, Adil Mardinogulu, Jens Nielsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 130 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 50 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,988,646
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#65,682
of 142,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,536
of 327,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,457
of 5,435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.