You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of a Cognitive Stimulation Therapy [CST] programme for people with dementia on family caregivers’ health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-14-31 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisa Aguirre, Zoe Hoare, Aimee Spector, Robert T Woods, Martin Orrell |
| Abstract |
There is growing evidence that Cognitive Simulation Therapy (CST) benefits cognition and quality of life of people with dementia, but little is known about the indirect effects of this intervention on family caregivers. This study sought to investigate the effect of CST on family caregivers general health status of people with dementia living in the community attending the CST intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 15% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 43 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,716,357
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,517
of 3,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,624
of 220,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#31
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.