↓ Skip to main content

Pulse oximetry for perioperative monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pulse oximetry for perioperative monitoring
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002013.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Pedersen, Amanda Nicholson, Karen Hovhannisyan, Ann Merete Møller, Andrew F Smith, Sharon R Lewis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 140 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Other 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 7 5%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 30 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,839,633
of 15,497,646 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,507
of 11,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,954
of 224,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,497,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.