↓ Skip to main content

Factors related to the incorrect use of inhalers by asthma patients.

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 252)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors related to the incorrect use of inhalers by asthma patients.
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
DOI 10.1590/s1806-37132014000100003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dalcin, Paulo de Tarso Roth, Grutcki, Denis Maltz, Laporte, Paola Paganella, Lima, Paula Borges de, Menegotto, Samuel Millan, Pereira, Rosemary Petrik, Dalcin, Paulo de Tarso Roth, Grutcki, Denis Maltz, Laporte, Paola Paganella, Lima, Paula Borges de, Menegotto, Samuel Millan, Pereira, Rosemary Petrik

Abstract

To evaluate inhaler technique in outpatients with asthma and to determine associations between the correctness of that technique and the level of asthma control.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,082,854
of 11,316,164 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
#50
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,556
of 192,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,316,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.