↓ Skip to main content

Adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 3,687)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
8 blogs
twitter
84 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
Title
Adrenaline for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Resuscitation, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.03.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steve Lin, Clifton W. Callaway, Prakesh S. Shah, Justin D. Wagner, Joseph Beyene, Carolyn P. Ziegler, Laurie J. Morrison

Abstract

The evidence for adrenaline in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation is inconclusive. We systematically reviewed the efficacy of adrenaline for adult OHCA.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 188 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 22%
Other 25 13%
Student > Master 24 12%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Other 46 23%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 27 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#189,922
of 15,096,771 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#42
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,031
of 223,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,096,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.