↓ Skip to main content

Eye on the Taiga: Removing Global Policy Impediments to Safeguard the Boreal Forest

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eye on the Taiga: Removing Global Policy Impediments to Safeguard the Boreal Forest
Published in
Conservation Letters, April 2014
DOI 10.1111/conl.12098
Authors

Jon Moen, Lucy Rist, Kevin Bishop, F. S. Chapin, David Ellison, Timo Kuuluvainen, Hans Petersson, Klaus J. Puettmann, Jeremy Rayner, Ian G. Warkentin, Corey J. A. Bradshaw

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 76 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Professor 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 30 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2019.
All research outputs
#794,758
of 15,978,059 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#329
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,983
of 191,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,978,059 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.