↓ Skip to main content

Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002010.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise S Conwell, Anne B Chang

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a bone mineralisation disorder occurring in about one third of adults with cystic fibrosis. Bisphosphonates can increase bone mineral density and decrease the risk of new fractures in post-menopausal women and people receiving long-term oral corticosteroids.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 182 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 18%
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Postgraduate 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 42 23%
Unknown 28 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 37 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2017.
All research outputs
#806,931
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,497
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,155
of 188,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.