↓ Skip to main content

Cannabinoids for Cancer Treatment: Progress and Promise

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
112 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
779 Facebook pages
googleplus
35 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cannabinoids for Cancer Treatment: Progress and Promise
Published in
Cancer Research, January 2008
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2785
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sami Sarfaraz, Vaqar M. Adhami, Deeba N. Syed, Farrukh Afaq, Hasan Mukhtar

Abstract

Cannabinoids are a class of pharmacologic compounds that offer potential applications as antitumor drugs, based on the ability of some members of this class to limit inflammation, cell proliferation, and cell survival. In particular, emerging evidence suggests that agonists of cannabinoid receptors expressed by tumor cells may offer a novel strategy to treat cancer. Here, we review recent work that raises interest in the development and exploration of potent, nontoxic, and nonhabit forming cannabinoids for cancer therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Unknown 308 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 15%
Researcher 48 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 14%
Student > Master 44 14%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 60 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 16%
Chemistry 18 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 5%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 70 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 354. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#91,177
of 25,401,381 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#54
of 18,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155
of 169,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#1
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.