↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Species Conservation Strategies to Reduce Disease-Associated Declines

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Letters, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying Species Conservation Strategies to Reduce Disease-Associated Declines
Published in
Conservation Letters, July 2017
DOI 10.1111/conl.12393
Authors

Brian D. Gerber, Sarah J. Converse, Erin Muths, Harry J. Crockett, Brittany A. Mosher, Larissa L. Bailey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Computer Science 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 4 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#364,231
of 13,584,688 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#154
of 750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,151
of 215,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,584,688 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.