↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of single-molecule sequencing and hybrid approaches for finishing the genome of Clostridium autoethanogenum and analysis of CRISPR systems in industrial relevant Clostridia

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 1,131)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 tweeters
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of single-molecule sequencing and hybrid approaches for finishing the genome of Clostridium autoethanogenum and analysis of CRISPR systems in industrial relevant Clostridia
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-7-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven D Brown, Shilpa Nagaraju, Sagar Utturkar, Sashini De Tissera, Simón Segovia, Wayne Mitchell, Miriam L Land, Asela Dassanayake, Michael Köpke

Abstract

Clostridium autoethanogenum strain JA1-1 (DSM 10061) is an acetogen capable of fermenting CO, CO2 and H2 (e.g. from syngas or waste gases) into biofuel ethanol and commodity chemicals such as 2,3-butanediol. A draft genome sequence consisting of 100 contigs has been published.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 200 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 26%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 12 5%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 13 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 59 27%
Engineering 11 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Chemical Engineering 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 19 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#719,915
of 14,860,150 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels
#22
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,896
of 190,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,860,150 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.