You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Protective mechanical ventilation in the non-injured lung: review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc13778 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuda Sutherasan, Maria Vargas, Paolo Pelosi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 2 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
Australia | 2 | 11% |
Turkey | 1 | 6% |
Colombia | 1 | 6% |
Italy | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 180 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 12% |
Other | 19 | 10% |
Researcher | 18 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
Other | 49 | 26% |
Unknown | 36 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 119 | 64% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
Engineering | 8 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,132,256
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,596
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,819
of 249,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.