↓ Skip to main content

Andrographolide attenuates skeletal muscle dystrophy in mdx mice and increases efficiency of cell therapy by reducing fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Muscle, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Andrographolide attenuates skeletal muscle dystrophy in mdx mice and increases efficiency of cell therapy by reducing fibrosis
Published in
Skeletal Muscle, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/2044-5040-4-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Cabrera, Jaime Gutiérrez, Claudio Cabello-Verrugio, Maria Gabriela Morales, Sergio Mezzano, Ricardo Fadic, Juan Carlos Casar, Juan L Hancke, Enrique Brandan

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is characterized by the absence of the cytoskeletal protein dystrophin, muscle wasting, increased transforming growth factor type beta (TGF-β) signaling, and fibrosis. At the present time, the only clinically validated treatments for DMD are glucocorticoids. These drugs prolong muscle strength and ambulation of patients for a short term only and have severe adverse effects. Andrographolide, a bicyclic diterpenoid lactone, has traditionally been used for the treatment of colds, fever, laryngitis, and other infections with no or minimal side effects. We determined whether andrographolide treatment of mdx mice, an animal model for DMD, affects muscle damage, physiology, fibrosis, and efficiency of cell therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Computer Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,719,257
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Muscle
#141
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,865
of 224,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Muscle
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them