↓ Skip to main content

Active video games as a tool to prevent excessive weight gain in adolescents: rationale, design and methods of a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Active video games as a tool to prevent excessive weight gain in adolescents: rationale, design and methods of a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monique Simons, Mai JM Chinapaw, Maaike van de Bovenkamp, Michiel R de Boer, Jacob C Seidell, Johannes Brug, Emely de Vet

Abstract

Excessive body weight, low physical activity and excessive sedentary time in youth are major public health concerns. A new generation of video games, the ones that require physical activity to play the games--i.e. active games--may be a promising alternative to traditional non-active games to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviors in youth. The aim of this manuscript is to describe the design of a study evaluating the effects of a family oriented active game intervention, incorporating several motivational elements, on anthropometrics and health behaviors in adolescents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 314 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 18%
Student > Bachelor 41 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Researcher 29 9%
Unspecified 21 7%
Other 70 22%
Unknown 62 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 13%
Psychology 40 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 10%
Sports and Recreations 26 8%
Social Sciences 23 7%
Other 83 26%
Unknown 74 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#5,663,710
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,599
of 14,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,596
of 224,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#86
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.