You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Design and quantification of an extreme winter storm scenario for emergency preparedness and planning exercises in California
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-011-9894-5 |
| Authors |
Michael D. Dettinger, F. Martin Ralph, Mimi Hughes, Tapash Das, Paul Neiman, Dale Cox, Gary Estes, David Reynolds, Robert Hartman, Daniel Cayan, Lucy Jones |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 107 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 24% |
| Researcher | 27 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 35 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 19% |
| Engineering | 13 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,041,747
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#552
of 1,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,213
of 117,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.