↓ Skip to main content

Tri-axial accelerometers quantify behaviour in the Eurasian badger (Meles meles): towards an automated interpretation of field data

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tri-axial accelerometers quantify behaviour in the Eurasian badger (Meles meles): towards an automated interpretation of field data
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/2050-3385-2-5
Authors

David W McClune, Nikki J Marks, Rory P Wilson, Jonathan DR Houghton, Ian W Montgomery, Natasha E McGowan, Eamonn Gormley, Michael Scantlebury

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 175 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 26%
Student > Master 35 19%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 19 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102 55%
Environmental Science 26 14%
Computer Science 10 5%
Engineering 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 26 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2014.
All research outputs
#6,879,458
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#151
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,390
of 224,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them