↓ Skip to main content

Assessing species vulnerability to climate and land use change: the case of the Swiss breeding birds

Overview of attention for article published in Diversity & Distributions, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing species vulnerability to climate and land use change: the case of the Swiss breeding birds
Published in
Diversity & Distributions, March 2014
DOI 10.1111/ddi.12207
Authors

Ramona Maggini, Anthony Lehmann, Niklaus Zbinden, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, Janine Bolliger, Boris Schröder, Ruud Foppen, Hans Schmid, Martin Beniston, Lukas Jenni

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Spain 4 2%
Switzerland 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
Italy 3 2%
Nepal 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Finland 2 1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 140 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 22%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 11 6%
Other 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 54%
Environmental Science 59 35%
Unspecified 8 5%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 4 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2014.
All research outputs
#6,246,799
of 12,354,747 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#609
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,555
of 196,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#31
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,354,747 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.