You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension in primary health care: A comparative clinical trial of two education strategies in health and nutrition
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-637 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amanda G Ribeiro, Sônia MR Ribeiro, Cristina MGC Dias, Andréia Q Ribeiro, Fátima AF Castro, Maria M Suárez-Varela, Rosângela MM Cotta |
Abstract |
Poor adherence to non-pharmacological treatment of hypertension represents a serious challenge for public health policies in several countries. This study was conducted to compare two intervention strategies regarding the adherence of adult women to dietary changes recommended for the treatment of hypertension in a community covered by Primary Health Care Unit. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 213 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 47 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 17% |
Researcher | 22 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
Other | 31 | 14% |
Unknown | 56 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 23 | 11% |
Unknown | 61 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2011.
All research outputs
#18,293,967
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,741
of 14,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,799
of 120,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#166
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.