↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the transcriptomes of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) and Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima) in response to the chestnut blight infection

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the transcriptomes of American chestnut (Castanea dentata) and Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima) in response to the chestnut blight infection
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-9-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdelali Barakat, Denis S DiLoreto, Yi Zhang, Chris Smith, Kathleen Baier, William A Powell, Nicholas Wheeler, Ron Sederoff, John E Carlson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 207 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 8%
Student > Master 15 7%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 148 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Environmental Science 11 5%
Engineering 4 2%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 37 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#668
of 3,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,167
of 103,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.