↓ Skip to main content

Multifunctional nanoparticles as a tissue adhesive and an injectable marker for image-guided procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multifunctional nanoparticles as a tissue adhesive and an injectable marker for image-guided procedures
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncomms15807
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kwangsoo Shin, Jin Woo Choi, Giho Ko, Seungmin Baik, Dokyoon Kim, Ok Kyu Park, Kyoungbun Lee, Hye Rim Cho, Sang Ihn Han, Soo Hong Lee, Dong Jun Lee, Nohyun Lee, Hyo-Cheol Kim, Taeghwan Hyeon

Abstract

Tissue adhesives have emerged as an alternative to sutures and staples for wound closure and reconnection of injured tissues after surgery or trauma. Owing to their convenience and effectiveness, these adhesives have received growing attention particularly in minimally invasive procedures. For safe and accurate applications, tissue adhesives should be detectable via clinical imaging modalities and be highly biocompatible for intracorporeal procedures. However, few adhesives meet all these requirements. Herein, we show that biocompatible tantalum oxide/silica core/shell nanoparticles (TSNs) exhibit not only high contrast effects for real-time imaging but also strong adhesive properties. Furthermore, the biocompatible TSNs cause much less cellular toxicity and less inflammation than a clinically used, imageable tissue adhesive (that is, a mixture of cyanoacrylate and Lipiodol). Because of their multifunctional imaging and adhesive property, the TSNs are successfully applied as a hemostatic adhesive for minimally invasive procedures and as an immobilized marker for image-guided procedures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 23%
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 13 12%
Professor 5 4%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 14 12%
Chemistry 10 9%
Engineering 10 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Chemical Engineering 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 38 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#639,086
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#11,102
of 48,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,698
of 315,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#234
of 875 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 875 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.