↓ Skip to main content

Direct thrombin inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct thrombin inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009893.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos A Salazar, Daniel del Aguila, Erika G Cordova

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 205 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 23%
Researcher 22 10%
Other 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Other 53 25%
Unknown 24 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 36 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,403,307
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,892
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,213
of 189,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.