↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of combining systematic identification and treatment of co-morbid major depression for people with chronic diseases: the example of cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cost-effectiveness of combining systematic identification and treatment of co-morbid major depression for people with chronic diseases: the example of cancer
Published in
Psychological Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1017/s0033291713002079
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Walker, J. Walker, G. Richardson, S. Palmer, Q. Wu, S. Gilbody, P. Martin, C. Holm Hansen, A. Sawhney, G. Murray, M. Sculpher, M. Sharpe

Abstract

Co-morbid major depression occurs in approximately 10% of people suffering from a chronic medical condition such as cancer. Systematic integrated management that includes both identification and treatment has been advocated. However, we lack information on the cost-effectiveness of this combined approach, as published evaluations have focused solely on the systematic (collaborative care) treatment stage. We therefore aimed to use the best available evidence to estimate the cost-effectiveness of systematic integrated management (both identification and treatment) compared with usual practice, for patients attending specialist cancer clinics.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 58 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 8%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 12 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2015.
All research outputs
#12,841,661
of 14,535,828 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#3,576
of 3,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,971
of 191,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#60
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,535,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.