↓ Skip to main content

Antarctic sea ice region as a source of biogenic organic nitrogen in aerosols

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Antarctic sea ice region as a source of biogenic organic nitrogen in aerosols
Published in
Scientific Reports, July 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-06188-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel Dall’Osto, Jurgita Ovadnevaite, Marco Paglione, David C. S. Beddows, Darius Ceburnis, Charlotte Cree, Pau Cortés, Marina Zamanillo, Sdena O. Nunes, Gonzalo L. Pérez, Eva Ortega-Retuerta, Mikhail Emelianov, Dolors Vaqué, Cèlia Marrasé, Marta Estrada, M. Montserrat Sala, Montserrat Vidal, Mark F. Fitzsimons, Rachael Beale, Ruth Airs, Matteo Rinaldi, Stefano Decesari, Maria Cristina Facchini, Roy M. Harrison, Colin O’Dowd, Rafel Simó

Abstract

Climate warming affects the development and distribution of sea ice, but at present the evidence of polar ecosystem feedbacks on climate through changes in the atmosphere is sparse. By means of synergistic atmospheric and oceanic measurements in the Southern Ocean near Antarctica, we present evidence that the microbiota of sea ice and sea ice-influenced ocean are a previously unknown significant source of atmospheric organic nitrogen, including low molecular weight alkyl-amines. Given the keystone role of nitrogen compounds in aerosol formation, growth and neutralization, our findings call for greater chemical and source diversity in the modelling efforts linking the marine ecosystem to aerosol-mediated climate effects in the Southern Ocean.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Unspecified 7 14%
Other 5 10%
Professor 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 18%
Unspecified 9 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 14%
Chemistry 6 12%
Other 7 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#396,632
of 13,115,713 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#4,547
of 62,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,243
of 264,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#27
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,115,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.