You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-247 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pieter Van Herck, Delphine De Smedt, Lieven Annemans, Roy Remmen, Meredith B Rosenthal, Walter Sermeus |
| Abstract |
Pay-for-performance (P4P) is one of the primary tools used to support healthcare delivery reform. Substantial heterogeneity exists in the development and implementation of P4P in health care and its effects. This paper summarizes evidence, obtained from studies published between January 1990 and July 2009, concerning P4P effects, as well as evidence on the impact of design choices and contextual mediators on these effects. Effect domains include clinical effectiveness, access and equity, coordination and continuity, patient-centeredness, and cost-effectiveness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 25% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 583 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 558 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 125 | 21% |
| Researcher | 85 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 15% |
| Other | 39 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 6% |
| Other | 118 | 20% |
| Unknown | 95 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 165 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 86 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 49 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 46 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 7% |
| Other | 76 | 13% |
| Unknown | 118 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#970,721
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#251
of 8,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,691
of 101,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.