↓ Skip to main content

Northern Elephant Seals Memorize the Rhythm and Timbre of Their Rivals’ Voices

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
40 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
35 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Northern Elephant Seals Memorize the Rhythm and Timbre of Their Rivals’ Voices
Published in
Current Biology, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Mathevon, Caroline Casey, Colleen Reichmuth, Isabelle Charrier

Abstract

Crocodilians are known to vocalize within the egg shortly before hatching [1,2]. Although a possible function of these calls - inducing hatching in siblings and stimulating the adult female to open the nest - has already been suggested, it has never been experimentally tested [1-5]. Here, we present the first experimental evidence that pre-hatching calls of Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) juveniles are informative acoustic signals which indeed target both siblings and mother.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Professor 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 38%
Neuroscience 13 13%
Psychology 9 9%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Linguistics 2 2%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 361. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#87,293
of 25,225,928 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#535
of 14,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,989
of 323,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#12
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.