You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rapidly progressive Fronto-temporal dementia (FTD) associated with Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) in the presence of Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) protein: a rare, sporadic, and aggressive form of FTD
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Psychogeriatrics, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1017/s1041610217001193 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicholas I. Bradfield, Catriona McLean, John Drago, David G. Darby, David Ames |
Abstract |
Fronto-temporal dementia (FTD) associated with Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) protein accumulation is an uncommon cause of FTD with a distinct syndrome of young age onset behavioral variant FTD, without a family history of FTD and caudate atrophy. We present a sporadic case of a 61-year-old patient with mixed features of both behavioral variant FTD with later semantic language dissolution associated with pathologically proven FUS. He was older than usual for FUS pathology, his course was rapidly progressive, and he had atypical language features. This case broadens the clinical spectrum caused by FUS-protein-related FTD. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 6 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
Psychology | 3 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,217,488
of 22,990,068 outputs
Outputs from International Psychogeriatrics
#415
of 1,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,905
of 315,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Psychogeriatrics
#11
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,990,068 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.