↓ Skip to main content

Post-exposure passive immunisation for preventing measles

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Post-exposure passive immunisation for preventing measles
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010056.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan K Young, Graeme R Nimmo, Allan W Cripps, Mark A Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 89 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 23%
Student > Bachelor 17 18%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Psychology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 17 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2019.
All research outputs
#891,515
of 14,076,191 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,726
of 10,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,240
of 191,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,076,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.