↓ Skip to main content

Emerging and Re-emerging Viral Infections

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 136: Human-Animal Interface: The Case for Influenza Interspecies Transmission.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Human-Animal Interface: The Case for Influenza Interspecies Transmission.
Chapter number 136
Book title
Emerging and Re-emerging Viral Infections
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/5584_2016_136
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-952484-9, 978-3-31-952485-6
Authors

Isabella Donatelli, Maria R. Castrucci, Maria A. De Marco, Mauro Delogu, Robert G. Webster, Donatelli, Isabella, Castrucci, Maria R., Marco, Maria A., Delogu, Mauro, Webster, Robert G.

Abstract

Since the 1990s, the threat of influenza viruses to veterinary and human public health has increased. This coincides with the larger global populations of poultry, pigs, and people and with changing ecological factors. These factors include the redistribution of the human population to cities, rapid mass transportation of people and infectious agents, increased global land use, climate change, and possible changes in viral ecology that perpetuate highly pathogenic influenza viruses in the aquatic bird reservoir. The emergence of H5N1, H7N9, and H9N2 subtypes of influenza A virus and the increased genetic exchange among influenza viruses in wild aquatic birds, domestic poultry, swine, and humans pose a continuing threat to humanity. Here we consider the fundamental and practical knowledge of influenza A viruses at the human-animal interfaces to facilitate the development of novel control strategies and modified agricultural practices that will reduce or prevent interspecies transmission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Other 12 27%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#18,603,172
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,327
of 4,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,719
of 394,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#285
of 444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.