↓ Skip to main content

Integration of rural and urban healthcare insurance schemes in China: an empirical research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integration of rural and urban healthcare insurance schemes in China: an empirical research
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Wang, Ang Zheng, Xin He, Hanghang Jiang

Abstract

Despite the broad coverage of the healthcare insurance system in China, the imbalances in fairness, accessibility and affordability of healthcare services have hindered the universal healthcare progress. To provide better financial protection for the Chinese population, China's new medical reform was proposed to link up urban employee basic medical insurance scheme (UEBMI), urban resident basic medical insurance scheme (URBMI), new rural cooperative medical system (NRCMS) and urban and rural medical assistance programs. In this paper, we focused on people's expected healthcare insurance model and their willingness towards healthcare insurance integration, and we made a couple of relative policy suggestions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Researcher 3 7%
Unspecified 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 23%
Unspecified 5 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 9%
Other 8 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2014.
All research outputs
#3,039,625
of 4,507,778 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,624
of 2,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,145
of 106,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#119
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,076 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.