You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The learner’s perspective in GP teaching practices with multi-level learners: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-55 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer S Thomson, Katrina Anderson, Emily Haesler, Amanda Barnard, Nicholas Glasgow |
| Abstract |
Medical students, junior hospital doctors on rotation and general practice (GP) registrars are undertaking their training in clinical general practices in increasing numbers in Australia. Some practices have four levels of learner. This study aimed to explore how multi-level teaching (also called vertical integration of GP education and training) is occurring in clinical general practice and the impact of such teaching on the learner. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 33% |
| Peru | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 48% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,731,484
of 24,040,389 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,385
of 3,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,616
of 227,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#27
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,040,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.