↓ Skip to main content

Chronic angioedema caused by navel orange but not citrus allergy: case report

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic angioedema caused by navel orange but not citrus allergy: case report
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-7022-3-s3-p159
Authors

S Boonpiyathad

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,226,417
of 11,505,507 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#203
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,907
of 262,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,505,507 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.