You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The No Alternatives Argument
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1093/bjps/axt045 |
Authors |
Richard Dawid, Stephan Hartmann, Jan Sprenger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Sweden | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Macao | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 38 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
Professor | 6 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philosophy | 14 | 33% |
Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
Psychology | 4 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,349,588
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
#29
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,719
of 270,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them