You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An Example of the Difference Between Quantum and Classical Random Walks
|
---|---|
Published in |
Quantum Information Processing, April 2002
|
DOI | 10.1023/a:1019609420309 |
Authors |
Andrew M. Childs, Edward Farhi, Sam Gutmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 2 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 3% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
Australia | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 171 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 23% |
Researcher | 39 | 21% |
Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 7% |
Other | 33 | 18% |
Unknown | 19 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 121 | 65% |
Computer Science | 21 | 11% |
Chemistry | 7 | 4% |
Mathematics | 6 | 3% |
Engineering | 6 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 3% |
Unknown | 19 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2017.
All research outputs
#8,384,214
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Quantum Information Processing
#160
of 1,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,220
of 129,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quantum Information Processing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them