↓ Skip to main content

Kinesiotaping for rotator cuff disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Kinesiotaping for rotator cuff disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012720
Authors

Silvia Gianola, Anita Andreano, Greta Castellini, Linda C Li, Lorenzo Moja, Maria Grazia Valsecchi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 25%
Student > Bachelor 10 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Psychology 3 6%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 12 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,657,879
of 13,210,683 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,616
of 10,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,525
of 265,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#190
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,210,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.