You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oral dextrose gel to prevent hypoglycaemia in at‐risk neonates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012152.pub2 |
| Authors |
Joanne E Hegarty, Jane E Harding, Caroline A Crowther, Julie Brown, Jane Alsweiler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,507,798
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,768
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,923
of 327,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#179
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.