↓ Skip to main content

Barriers to implementation of a redesign of information transfer and feedback in acute care: results from a multiple case study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers to implementation of a redesign of information transfer and feedback in acute care: results from a multiple case study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janneke E van Leijen-Zeelenberg, Arno JA van Raak, Inge GP Duimel-Peeters, Mariëlle EAL Kroese, Peter RG Brink, Dirk Ruwaard, Hubertus JM Vrijhoef

Abstract

Accurate information transfer is an important element of continuity of care and patient safety. Despite the demonstrated urge for improvement of communication in acute care, there is a lack of data on improvements of communication. This study aims to describe the barriers to implementation of a redesign of the existing model for information transfer and feedback.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Unspecified 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 11 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Social Sciences 6 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Unspecified 5 16%
Engineering 3 10%
Other 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2014.
All research outputs
#5,714,190
of 11,344,222 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,616
of 3,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,197
of 185,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#53
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,344,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.