↓ Skip to main content

Repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
63 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repositioning for pressure ulcer prevention in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009958.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brigid M Gillespie, Wendy P Chaboyer, Elizabeth McInnes, Bridie Kent, Jennifer A Whitty, Lukman Thalib

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 364 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 19%
Student > Bachelor 71 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 8%
Researcher 29 8%
Student > Postgraduate 28 8%
Other 85 23%
Unknown 57 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 125 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 107 29%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 72 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2020.
All research outputs
#450,277
of 15,462,213 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,148
of 11,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,446
of 193,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,462,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.