↓ Skip to main content

Psychosocial interventions for premature ejaculation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychosocial interventions for premature ejaculation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008195.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Melnik, Stanley Althof, Álvaro N Atallah, Maria Eduarda dos Santos Puga, Sidney Glina, Rachel Riera

Abstract

Premature ejaculation (PE) is a very common sexual dysfunction among patients, and with varying prevalence estimates ranging from 3% to 20%. Although psychological issues are present in most patients with premature PE, as a cause or as a consequence, research on the effects of psychological approaches for PE has in general not been controlled or randomised and is lacking in long-term follow up.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 18%
Unspecified 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Other 30 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 49%
Psychology 20 26%
Unspecified 19 25%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 9 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,933,620
of 12,805,946 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,974
of 10,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,882
of 85,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,805,946 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.