You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microbial risk assessment of local handling and use of human faeces
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Water & Health, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.2166/wh.2006.049 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline Schönning, Therese Westrell, Thor Axel Stenström, Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Arne Bernt Hasling, Linda Høibye, Anders Carlsen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 33 | 35% |
| Engineering | 18 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,448,088
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Water & Health
#127
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,814
of 89,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Water & Health
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.