↓ Skip to main content

Quality of family history collection with use of a patient facing family history assessment tool

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality of family history collection with use of a patient facing family history assessment tool
Published in
BMC Primary Care, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-15-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

R Ryanne Wu, Tiffany L Himmel, Adam H Buchanan, Karen P Powell, Elizabeth R Hauser, Geoffrey S Ginsburg, Vincent C Henrich, Lori A Orlando

Abstract

Studies have shown that the quality of family health history (FHH) collection in primary care is inadequate to assess disease risk. To use FHH for risk assessment, collected data must have adequate detail. To address this issue, we developed a patient facing FHH assessment tool, MeTree. In this paper we report the content and quality of the FHH collected using MeTree.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#8,185,927
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,068
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,345
of 329,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#21
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.