↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of the Newcastle laryngeal hypersensitivity questionnaire.

Overview of attention for article published in Cough, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of the Newcastle laryngeal hypersensitivity questionnaire.
Published in
Cough, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-9974-10-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vertigan AE, Bone SL, Gibson PG

Abstract

Laryngeal hypersensitivity may be an important component of the common disorders of laryngeal motor dysfunction including chronic refractory cough, pdoxical vocal fold movement (vocal cord dysfunction), muscle tension dysphonia, and globus pharyngeus. Patients with these conditions frequently report sensory disturbances, and an emerging concept of the 'irritable larynx' suggests common features of a sensory neuropathic dysfunction as a part of these disorders. The aim of this study was to develop a Laryngeal Hypersensitivity Questionnaire for patients with laryngeal dysfunction syndromes in order to measure the laryngeal sensory disturbance occurring in these conditions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 54 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Master 8 14%
Other 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 6 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,291,702
of 15,123,435 outputs
Outputs from Cough
#6
of 54 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,539
of 192,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cough
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,123,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them