↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Downhole and Surface Sampling for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ground Water

Overview of attention for article published in Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 262)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Downhole and Surface Sampling for the Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Ground Water
Published in
Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation, February 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1992.tb00418.x
Authors

Michael E. Rosen, James F. Pankow, Jacob Gibs, Thomas E. Imbrigiotta

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1999.
All research outputs
#4,421,499
of 14,498,896 outputs
Outputs from Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation
#43
of 262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,691
of 268,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,498,896 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 262 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them