↓ Skip to main content

Methods: Validity and utility of community health workers' estimation of kava use

Overview of attention for article published in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methods: Validity and utility of community health workers' estimation of kava use
Published in
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, February 2002
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2002.tb00271.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan R. Clough, Ross Bailie, Chris B. Burns, Terrence Guyula, Roslyn Wunungmurra, Sylvia Rrepula Wanybarrnga

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#1,065
of 1,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,342
of 132,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.