You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Risk of surgical site infection and efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis: a cohort study of appendectomy patients in Thailand
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-6-111 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nongyao Kasatpibal, Mette Nørgaard, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Henrik Carl Schønheyder, Silom Jamulitrat, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 99 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 16% |
Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
Researcher | 11 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 16% |
Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 50% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,579
of 7,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,252
of 66,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.