↓ Skip to main content

Whole body vibration exercise for chronic low back pain: study protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whole body vibration exercise for chronic low back pain: study protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xue-Qiang Wang, Yan-Lin Pi, Pei-Jie Chen, Bin-Lin Chen, Lei-Chao Liang, Xin Li, Xiao Wang, Juan Zhang

Abstract

Low back pain affects approximately 80% of people at some stage in their lives. Exercise therapy is the most widely used nonsurgical intervention for low back pain in practice guidelines. Whole body vibration exercise is becoming increasingly popular for relieving musculoskeletal pain and improving health-related quality of life. However, the efficacy of whole body vibration exercise for low back pain is not without dispute. This study aims to estimate the effect of whole body vibration exercise for chronic low back pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 248 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 12%
Student > Master 30 12%
Researcher 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 81 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 18%
Sports and Recreations 20 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Neuroscience 9 4%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 91 36%