↓ Skip to main content

Two types of mental fatigue affect spontaneous oscillatory brain activities in different ways

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral and Brain Functions, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two types of mental fatigue affect spontaneous oscillatory brain activities in different ways
Published in
Behavioral and Brain Functions, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1744-9081-9-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshihito Shigihara, Masaaki Tanaka, Akira Ishii, Etsuko Kanai, Masami Funakura, Yasuyoshi Watanabe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 125 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 21%
Student > Master 23 18%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 28%
Neuroscience 12 9%
Sports and Recreations 12 9%
Engineering 11 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 29 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,336,933
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#69
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,227
of 292,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.