↓ Skip to main content

Obesity and Cardiovascular Diseases Implications Regarding Fitness, Fatness, and Severity in the Obesity Paradox

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
29 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
513 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1511 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Obesity and Cardiovascular Diseases Implications Regarding Fitness, Fatness, and Severity in the Obesity Paradox
Published in
JACC, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl J. Lavie, Paul A. McAuley, Timothy S. Church, Richard V. Milani, Steven N. Blair

Abstract

Obesity has been increasing in epidemic proportions, with a disproportionately higher increase in morbid or class III obesity, and obesity adversely affects cardiovascular (CV) hemodynamics, structure, and function, as well as increases the prevalence of most CV diseases. Progressive declines in physical activity over 5 decades have occurred and have primarily caused the obesity epidemic. Despite the potential adverse impact of overweight and obesity, recent epidemiological data have demonstrated an association of mild obesity and, particularly, overweight on improved survival. We review in detail the obesity paradox in CV diseases where overweight and at least mildly obese patients with most CV diseases seem to have a better prognosis than do their leaner counterparts. The implications of cardiorespiratory fitness with prognosis are discussed, along with the joint impact of fitness and adiposity on the obesity paradox. Finally, in light of the obesity paradox, the potential value of purposeful weight loss and increased physical activity to affect levels of fitness is reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 1493 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 86 6%
Student > Bachelor 56 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 4%
Researcher 49 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 3%
Other 125 8%
Unknown 1102 73%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 166 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 3%
Sports and Recreations 37 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 2%
Other 67 4%
Unknown 1124 74%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2021.
All research outputs
#305,854
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#691
of 16,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,873
of 331,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#2
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.