↓ Skip to main content

Early versus late chest radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early versus late chest radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004700.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madelon Pijls-Johannesma, Dirk K M De Ruysscher, Philippe Lambin, Ruud Houben, Isabelle Rutten, Johan F. Vansteenkiste

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 35%
Other 7 16%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Lecturer 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 72%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,289,455
of 15,456,294 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,905
of 11,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,237
of 270,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,456,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.