↓ Skip to main content

Early versus late chest radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early versus late chest radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004700.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madelon Pijls-Johannesma, Dirk K M De Ruysscher, Philippe Lambin, Ruud Houben, Isabelle Rutten, Johan F. Vansteenkiste

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 27%
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 5 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,528,505
of 16,629,244 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,181
of 11,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,202
of 273,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,629,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,549 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.